Accéder au contenu
MilliporeSigma

905380

(S,R,S)-AHPC-C6-PEG3-butyl chloride

≥95%

Synonyme(s) :

(2S,4R)-1-((S)-2-(tert-Butyl)-22-chloro-4-oxo-10,13,16-trioxa-3-azadocosanoyl)-4-hydroxy-N-(4-(4-methylthiazol-5-yl)benzyl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxamide, (S,R,S)-AHPC-6-2-2-6-Cl, Crosslinker−E3 Ligase ligand conjugate, Protein degrader building block for PROTAC® research, Template for synthesis of targeted protein degrader, VH032 conjugate

Se connecter pour consulter les tarifs organisationnels et contractuels.

Sélectionner une taille de conditionnement

Changer de vue

A propos de cet article

Formule empirique (notation de Hill) :
C38H59ClN4O7S
Numéro CAS:
Poids moléculaire :
751.42
UNSPSC Code:
12352101
NACRES:
NA.22
MDL number:
Service technique
Besoin d'aide ? Notre équipe de scientifiques expérimentés est là pour vous.
Laissez-nous vous aider


ligand

VH032

assay

≥95%

form

solid

reaction suitability

reactivity: sulfuryl reactive, reagent type: ligand-linker conjugate

functional group

alkyl halide

storage temp.

2-8°C

SMILES string

ClCCCCCCOCCOCCOCCCCCC(N[C@H](C(N1[C@H](C(NCC2=CC=C(C3=C(C)N=CS3)C=C2)=O)C[C@@H](O)C1)=O)C(C)(C)C)=O

InChI

1S/C38H59ClN4O7S/c1-28-34(51-27-41-28)30-15-13-29(14-16-30)25-40-36(46)32-24-31(44)26-43(32)37(47)35(38(2,3)4)42-33(45)12-8-7-11-19-49-21-23-50-22-20-48-18-10-6-5-9-17-39/h13-16,27,31-32,35,44H,5-12,17-26H2,1-4H3,(H,40,46)(H,42,45)/t31-,32+,35-/m1/s1

InChI key

MLRLOIWXHCPWFF-MEEYNGGZSA-N

Application

Protein degrader builiding block (S,R,S)-AHPC-C6-PEG3-butyl Chloride enables the synthesis of molecules for targeted protein degradation and PROTAC (proteolysis-targeting chimeras) technology. This conjugate contains a von Hippel–Lindau (VHL)-recruiting ligand, a linker with both hydrophobic and hydrophilic moieties, and a pendant chloroalkane for reactivity with a nucleophilic group on a target ligand. Because even slight alterations in ligands and crosslinkers can affect ternary complex formation between the target, E3 ligase, and PROTAC, many analogs are prepared to screen for optimal target degradation. When used with other protein degrader building blocks with a pendant chloro group, parallel synthesis can be used to more quickly generate PROTAC libraries that feature variation in crosslinker length, composition, and E3 ligase ligand.

Legal Information

PROTAC is a registered trademark of Arvinas Operations, Inc., and is used under license


Classe de stockage

11 - Combustible Solids

wgk

WGK 3

flash_point_f

Not applicable

flash_point_c

Not applicable



Faites votre choix parmi les versions les plus récentes :

Certificats d'analyse (COA)

Lot/Batch Number

It looks like we've run into a problem, but you can still download Certificates of Analysis from our Documents section.

Si vous avez besoin d'assistance, veuillez contacter Service Clients

Déjà en possession de ce produit ?

Retrouvez la documentation relative aux produits que vous avez récemment achetés dans la Bibliothèque de documents.

Consulter la Bibliothèque de documents


Articles

Protein Degrader Building Blocks are a collection of crosslinker-E3 ligand conjugates with a pendant functional group for covalent linkage to a target ligand.


Ashton C Lai et al.
Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English), 55(2), 807-810 (2015-11-26)
Proteolysis Targeting Chimera (PROTAC) technology is a rapidly emerging alternative therapeutic strategy with the potential to address many of the challenges currently faced in modern drug development programs. PROTAC technology employs small molecules that recruit target proteins for ubiquitination and
Momar Toure et al.
Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English), 55(6), 1966-1973 (2016-01-13)
The current inhibitor-based approach to therapeutics has inherent limitations owing to its occupancy-based model: 1) there is a need to maintain high systemic exposure to ensure sufficient in vivo inhibition, 2) high in vivo concentrations bring potential for off-target side effects, and 3) there is
Kedra Cyrus et al.
Molecular bioSystems, 7(2), 359-364 (2010-10-06)
Conventional genetic approaches have provided a powerful tool in the study of proteins. However, these techniques often preclude selective manipulation of temporal and spatial protein functions, which is crucial for the investigation of dynamic cellular processes. To overcome these limitations